Thursday, January 03, 2008
By Steven Milloy
Newt Gingrich has guzzled Al Gore’s Kool-Aid. Now he wants us and the Republican 2008 presidential
candidates to drink it, too.
The former House Speaker’s latest book, "A Contract with the Earth" co-authored with Palm Beach
Zoo CEO Terry Maple, is an appalling paean to environmental naïveté and taxpayer-subsidized profiteering.
While the book’s theme — i.e., let’s all just happily pitch in and do what it takes to save the
environment — may sound reasonable, at least on a superficial basis, Mr. Gingrich’s notions are often
wrong or simply bizarre, and his prescriptions amount to little more than a full embrace of rent-seeking
"green" business and left-leaning eco-activist groups, both of which often masquerade as
"protectors" of the environment.
The book opens with the melodramatic line, "We are personally diminished by the loss of each and every
species or habitat that cannot resist extinction."
But nowhere does Mr. Gingrich indicate that we’ve been diminished by the ongoing malarial genocide in Africa
caused by the senseless 1972 ban on the pesticide DDT — which was promoted by the Environmental Defense, a
command-and-control activist group laughably lauded by Mr. Gingrich as an "advocate of market-based
solutions to environmental problems."
... continues below advertisement:
Another over-the-top sentiment is Mr. Gingrich’s endorsement of Harvard biologist E.O. Wilson’s
doomsday observance, "The living world is dying." But if Mr. Gingrich wants to be taken seriously on
the environment — he claims to have been an environmental studies professor — such meaningless drivel is
Mr. Gingrich asks, "Who among us lacks a fundamental respect for the earth?" But he simultaneously
slams so-called "anti-environmental politicians" as "out of step with the American people"
and the "patriotic worldview" — whatever that is. I don’t know of any politician who is
"anti-environment," though there are a great many who demand that environmental policy be based on
sound science and cost-benefit analysis, and who distrust politicized eco-activists.
Mr. Gingrich wants us to work for a common cause but he has little use for the opinions of others, regardless
of their expertise and his lack thereof. In response to the view of Shell Oil’s CEO that America will always
need foreign oil even as it develops alternative energy sources, Gingrich dismissively writes, "It is
difficult, if not impossible, to have an intelligent conversation about energy if we cannot agree that
independence from foreign oil, ... [and] from fossil fuel, is achievable." The book is better titled,
"My Way or the Highway."
"The distribution of carcinogens in the environment is a serious problem… a healthier environment is
needed to defeat many forms of cancer," writes Mr. Gingrich. Without any citations, however, it’s
difficult to imagine what he’s talking about. Substances in the environment as detectable, let alone,
significant causes of cancer is a Jimmy Carter-era
notion that decades of scientific investigation has yet to validate.
Mr. Gingrich discusses something called "nature deficit disorder" (NDO), which self-described
"futurist" Richard Louv has hypothesized as children’s underexposure to nature and a contributing
factor to attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Although not "yet" recognized by
scientists, Mr. Gingrich calls NDO a "compelling" idea.
The ethanol industry is praised as are many other subsidy-hungry industries aiming to profit from real and
imagined environmental and energy concerns. Mr. Gingrich doesn’t mention, however, that ever-increasing
government subsidies to the ethanol industry are distorting agricultural markets, increasing consumer prices
and putting more stress on the environment, all while failing to produce discernible environmental benefits or
While Mr. Gingrich praises the use of tax credits and subsidies to convert landfill gases, manure and wind
power into energy, there’s nary a word about the only practical and truly green power source available —
The book’s examples of entrepreneurship as a means to advancing environmental goals fall apart upon closer
Shell Oil, for example, is praised for reducing carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions by pumping the gas into
greenhouses in Rotterdam rather than into the atmosphere. But this amounts to only a slight delay in the
atmospheric release of a miniscule amount of CO2. Where does Mr. Gingrich think the CO2 goes after the
short-lived plants are consumed or decompose?
The 2004 hijacking of 680,000 acres of Chilean forest from a U.S. timber company and scuttling of the
largest-ever sustainable forestry project through the combined efforts of The Nature Conservancy, Wildlife
Conservation Society and investment bank Goldman Sachs is offered as an example of "protecting hallowed
sites." As readers of this column know, however, the "Great
Chilean Land Steal" is actually an example of how the poor people of Chile, the environment, and a
U.S. business all received the short-end of the stick while the environmentalists made off with a
multi-billion dollar asset.
That is not the only example of where Mr. Gingrich’s apparently beloved Nature Conservancy has operated more
in its own narrow interests than on behalf the of public on whose behalf it has been bestowed tax-exempt
Not surprisingly, the book exalts Sierra Club founder John Muir. Interestingly, Mr. Gingrich blithely mentions
Muir’s martial law-like view favoring use of the military to enforce environmental law. Disturbingly, he
moves on without ever disapproving the policy.
Without explanation, Mr. Gingrich slams the Congress and President Bush for "having failed to exert
sufficient and effective leadership on the environment." Not only does Mr. Gingrich "anticipate a
return to assertive American leadership," presumably after the 2008 elections, but he calls for an end to
But from checks-and-balances to the two-party system, our form of government is built on adversarial
processes. Only in totalitarian systems — much to the disadvantage of their populations and environments —
are adversarial politics absent.
Mr. Gingrich says you can tell which presidential candidate to support by evaluating his advisors’ positions
on the environment. Terrific. So if you see Mr. Gingrich advising a candidate, consider yourself forewarned.
JunkScience.com is updated every weekday. Items from the main page are moved to the archives.
Links should be good for at least the date posted. After the posting date, link reliability depends on the
policy of the linked sites. Some sites require visitors to register before allowing access to articles.
Material presented on this page represents the opinion of JunkScience.com. Copyright -- 1996-2007
JunkScience.com, Inc. All rights reserved on original works. Material copyrighted by others is used either
with permission or under a claim of "fair use."