Top 10 Climate Myth-Busters for 2007
Thursday, December 27, 2007
By Steven Milloy
“I’ve made up my mind. Don’t confuse me with the facts.”
That saying most appropriately sums up the year in climate science for the fanatic global warming crowd.
As Al Gore, the United Nations, grandstanding politicians and celebrities,
taxpayer-dependent climate researchers, socialist-minded Greens, climate profiteers and other members of the
alarmist railroad relentlessly continued their drive for greenhouse gas regulation in 2007, the year’s
scientific developments actually pointed in the opposite direction. Here’s the round-up:
1. Cracked crystal
balls. Observed temperature changes measured over the last 30 years don’t match well with
temperatures predicted by the mathematical climate models relied on by the U.N.'s Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change (IPCC), researchers reported.
The models predict significantly warmer atmospheric temperatures than actually occurred,
despite the availability of more and better quality data and improved modeling efforts since the late-1970s.
“We suggest, therefore, that projections of future climate based on these models be
viewed with much caution,” the researchers concluded. Read
... continues below advertisement:
2. The big yellow
ball in the sky. The Sun may have contributed 50 percent or more of the global warming thought to
have occurred since 1900, according to a new historical temperature reconstruction showing more variation in
pre-industrial temperatures than previously thought.
The researchers found that “the climate is very sensitive to solar changes and a
significant fraction of the global warming that occurred during the last century should be solar induced.” Read
3. Pre-SUV warming.
Another new temperature reconstruction for the past 2,000 years indicates that globally averaged temperature
1,000 years ago was about 0.3 degrees Celsius warmer than the current temperature. Since that climatic
"heat wave" obviously wasn’t caused by coal-fired power plants and SUVs, the current temperature
is quite within natural variability, deflating alarmists’ rash conclusions about the warming of the past 50
years. Read more…
4. A disciplined
climate. Runaway global warming -- the alarmist fantasy in which a warmer global temperature causes
climatic events that, in turn, cause more warming and so-on in a never-ending positive feedback loop -- was
cornered by new data from researchers at the University of Alabama-Huntsville (UAH). The new research sheds
light on the mechanism by which the atmosphere self-regulates. Read
5. A gnarly wipeout.
Climate alarmists gleefully surfed a 2005 study that claimed greenhouse gas emissions would slow Atlantic
Ocean circulation and cause a mini ice age in Europe. But an international team of researchers reported that
the intensity of the Atlantic circulation may vary by as much as a factor of eight in a single year. The
decrease in Atlantic circulation claimed in the 2005study falls well within this variation and so is likely
part of a natural yearly trend, according to the new study. Read
6. A pollution
solution. A new study reported that the solid particles suspended in the atmosphere (called
“aerosols”) that make up “brown clouds” may actually contribute to warmer temperatures -- precisely
the opposite effect heretofore claimed by global warming alarmists.
“These findings might seem to contradict the general notion of aerosol particles as
cooling agents in the global climate system …,” concluded the researchers. Read
7. Lazy temperature?
Researchers reported that the rate of manmade carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions was three times greater during
2000 to 2004 than during the 1990s. Since increasing atmospheric C02 levels allegedly cause global warming,
the new study must mean that global temperatures are soaring even faster now than they did during the 1990s,
Wrong. According to the most recent data from the U.S. Department of Commerce’s National
Climatic Data Center, ever-changing global temperatures are in no way keeping pace with ever-increasing
atmospheric carbon dioxide levels. Read
8. Don’t plant that
tree! Researchers reported that while tropical forests exert a cooling influence on global climate,
forests in northern regions exert a significant warming influence on climate. Based on the researchers’
computer modeling, forests above 20 degrees latitude in the Northern Hemisphere -- that is, north of the line
of latitude running through Southern Mexico, Saharan Africa, central India and the southernmost Chinese Island
of Hainan -- will warm surface temperatures in those regions by an estimated 10 degrees Fahrenheit by the year
2100. Read more…
9. The Tropical
Arctic. Dutch researchers reported that during a period of intense global warming 55 million years
ago -- when the Arctic Ocean was as warm as 73 degrees Fahrenheit -- there was a tremendous release of
greenhouse gases into the atmosphere. But which came first, the warming or the greenhouse gases?
It was the warming, according to the researchers. Read
10. Much ado about
nothing. In a report to Congress, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency revealed greenhouse gas
regulation to be quite the fool’s errand. In estimating the atmospheric levels of greenhouse gases 90 years
from now under both a scenario where no action is taken to reduce manmade emissions and a scenario where
maximum regulation is implemented, the estimated difference in average global temperature between the two
scenarios is 0.17 degrees Centigrade.
For reference purposes, the estimated total increase in average global temperature for the
20th century was about 0.50 degrees Celsius.
That’s what researchers have reported this year. And let’s not forget the spanking a
British high judge gave Al Gore’s movie for all its scientific inaccuracies and the thrashing
non-alarmist climate scientists gave to alarmist climate scientists in a debate sponsored by the New York
debating society Intelligence Squared.
Al Gore and the alarmist mob claim the debate about the science of global warming is
“over.” Given the developments of 2007, it’s easy to see why they would want it that way.
Steven Milloy publishes JunkScience.com
He is a junk science expert, and advocate
of free enterprise and an adjunct scholar at the Competitive Enterprise