Get serious about food safety
Editorial
Copyright 1998 Los Angeles Times
August 25, 1998
Shortly after Upton Sinclair's 1906 book
"The Jungle" exposed the filth in Chicago's meat processing plants, Congress passed a law
requiring daily inspections. That law halted hazardous practices like
processing meat from long-dead animals. As a new report by the
National Academy of Sciences points out, however, today's food safety system
has itself become a jungle: an impenetrable thicket of outdated rules enforced
by a dozen federal agencies.
The report urges Congress to consolidate food oversight in a single
"high-ranking, presidentially appointed head." But the solution lies a step further, creating a single food safety agency.
The food industry rejects the idea of consolidating oversight because, as a
Grocery Manufacturers of
America spokesman puts it,
"We're just not convinced yet that a super-bureaucracy is the panacea to food
safety. . . .
"
A single food agency, however, should streamline bureaucracy, saving lives as
well as dollars. Currently the Agriculture Department's 7,000 food inspectors
are required to make daily visual
inspections of every animal carcass in meatpacking houses. These cursory
"poke-and-sniff" inspections could detect problems like the spoilage rife in Upton Sinclair's
day, but they cannot detect campylobacter, E. coli and other bacteria that
cause most food-borne disease today. Congress should
require inspectors to use high-tech equipment and should provide the needed
funds.
More fundamentally, Congress and the Clinton administration need to smooth out
uneven federal oversight. While the Agriculture Department is required to
inspect the meat on frozen pizzas every day, for example, the Food and Drug
Administration is required to examine the cheese for those pizzas only once
every 10 years.
Six congressional bills have been introduced in recent months to improve food
safety. Two would give the FDA and the USDA long-overdue authority to recall
food they suspect is tainted. All six bills, however, have
languished in committees. And while the Senate appropriated $ 68 million last
month to improve food safety, Rep. Bill Archer (R-Texas), chairman of the
Agriculture Appropriations Committee, says he opposes the Senate plan,
complaining that the money would come from funds now given to tobacco farmers
to help
buy crop insurance.
Congress, in other words, has yet to take food safety seriously. When
legislators return to Washington early next month, they should recognize the
academy report for what it is: an alarm for a nation at risk.
Comments on this posting?
Click here to post a public comment on the Trash Talk
Bulletin Board.
Click here to send a private comment to the Junkman.
Material presented on this home page constitutes opinion of Steven J. Milloy.
Copyright © 1998 Steven
J. Milloy. All rights reserved on original material. Material copyrighted by others is used either with permission or under a claim of "fair
use." Site developed and hosted by WestLake
Solutions, Inc.